Ari Armstrong's Web Log (Main) | Archives | Terms of Use

Colorado Rep. Bottoms Rejects Science of Evolution

Biological evolution is supported by millions of fossils and research from multiple fields.

Copyright © 2024 by Ari Armstrong
This article originally was published by the Colorado Times Recorder on January 12, 2024, and republished here on January 17.

At a recent church-sponsored town hall in Colorado Springs, Colorado Representative and pastor Scott Bottoms rejected the science of biological evolution, calling it a hoax, Heidi Beedle reported. To my knowledge, Bottoms is the highest-ranking elected official currently serving in the state to explicitly reject evolution. He joins District 51 school board member Barbara Evanson, who, with her husband (also a pastor) penned a screed against evolution and called for the teaching of creationism in public-school science classrooms.

Bottoms said, "I am not an evolutionist, I think that's a big hoax. It's been a hoax since it was propagated, and most scientists nowadays know it was a hoax. They're not allowed to talk about it, but they know that. But here's the thing—if you believe in evolution, why don't you just kill people?"

Bottoms's claim that "most scientists" reject evolution is of course complete nonsense. Biological evolution is the foundation of the life sciences, supported by millions of fossils and extensive research from multiple fields, including genetics and geology. Someone who rejects biological evolution is no more a life scientist than someone who rejects the theory of gravity is a physicist or someone who rejects the germ theory of disease is an epidemiologist. "Among scientists connected to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 98% say they believe humans evolved over time," Pew reports.

In Bottoms's fevered imagination, some grand conspiracy results in scientists claiming to believe in biological evolution while "really" believing the opposite.

According to the same Pew report, large majorities of religious people in the U.S. believe that humans evolved, although most Protestants and Catholics think that evolution is "guided by God or a higher power." (Most Southern Baptists, on the other hand, believe humans "always existed in their present form.") In a 1950 Encyclical, Pope Pius XII, although skeptical, allowed room for "the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter." Various other churches have embraced evolution.

The stance of elected officials toward science matters. According to the 2023 state achievement results in science from the Colorado Measures of Academic Success (CMAS), only 33.9% of fifth grade students met or exceeded expectations, only 31.3% of eighth graders did, and only 24.6% of eleventh graders did. For a state representative who votes on education policy to display such willful ignorance of basic science does not set a good example.

Bottoms suggests, nonsensically, that people who believe in evolution logically should "just kill people." Perhaps he would limit his claims to secularists who embrace evolution and not include the millions of religious Americans who accept biological evolution.

Bottoms ignores not only thousands of years of secular moral tradition (notably that of Aristotle) but modern crime trends as well. If Bottoms were right that secularists tend to be more violent, then we would expect more-secular countries to be more violent. Yet Canadians, for example, express overall strong approval for evolution, while Canada's homicide rate is less than half that of the United States. Phil Zuckerman points out that "the most godless democracies on earth today—Japan, Sweden, South Korea, Norway, Estonia, the United Kingdom, and the Czech Republic," have low levels of violence and generally good outcomes.

Bottoms also ignores the intense violence through Christian history, with the faith's wars between sects, its Crusades, its Inquisitions, its burning of heretics, and its witch hunts. Such violence arose not from the acceptance of science but from the embrace of imagined supernatural forces and eternal stakes.

Secularists, by contrast, tend to believe that the quality of life on Earth matters enormously—it is the only life we have—so they tend to be profoundly motivated to achieve a prosperous, peaceful life on Earth and to create rights-respecting governments toward that end. (I agree with philosopher Leonard Peikoff that Marxism, while atheistic, constitutes a sort of religious dogma, with its collectivism and alleged historical "dialectic" forces.)

Bottoms's faith has not dissuaded him from displaying casual bigotry toward a legislative colleague, Brianna Titone, a transgender woman. He said of Titone at the town hall (as Beedle reports), "I will never, ever, ever in my whole life call him 'she.'" Bottoms also absurdly suggested that transgender women (born male biologically) claim to have ovaries.

Bottoms generally is motivated by an anti-scientific, supernaturalist worldview characterized by conspiracy mongering and appeals to demonic forces. As James O'Rourke reported for the Times Recorder, Bottoms called legislative supporters of a sex-education bill "pedophiles"; he said that pastors who declined to condemn homosexuality were tricked by Satan; he claimed that ultimately "all sickness comes from Satan"; he claimed that Islam and Hinduism are inspired by (you guessed it) Satan; he claimed that "Biden didn't win" the 2020 presidential election; and he suggested that the Covid vaccine might be "the mark of the beast."

Bottoms does not know, and unfortunately is hostile to learning, what he is missing when it comes to the science of biological change. As Charles Darwin wrote in the closing lines of his breakthrough On the Origin of Species, "There is grandeur in this view of life . . . from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved."

Ari Armstrong's Web Log (Main) | Archives | Terms of Use